I have started using the Family Tree feature developed by FamilySearch.org. As you may know, this has been available for use by LDS members for some time. Well, now it is out of beta testing and available to non-LDS members.
Development continues on Family Tree, which is termed an update that will eventaully replace FamilySearch.org, believe it or not. You can experience Family Tree for yourself by registering to use it at http://familysearch.org/invite/familytree_tab.
I was particularly interested in trying out Family Tree to research my parternal ancestry in Finland. I entered some preliminary information through my paternal great grandparents and Family Tree found and added several more generations--to the middle 16th century, in fact. I'm pretty comfortable with what it generated for my paternal grandmother's line, but my grandfather's line appears to me a bit shaky. The new information is based on family relationships researched by others and on the International Genealogical Index.
At the moment, there are few sources included in my FamilySearch Family Tree, but I am confident that I can find and add them as the parishes in central Finland kept good records. It's just a matter of checking each generation of ancestors back through the records, which are becoming available online.
A reference guide for using Family Search Family Tree is available at http://broadcast.lds.org/eLearning/fhd/Community/en/FamilySearch/FamilyTree/pdf/familyTreeUserGuide.pdf.
I will also be adding information on my mother's ancestry, which happens to go back to pre-colonial days in America. That also should be interesting.
Collecting Ancestors
Welcome to my blog about my genealogical research experiences, the techniques I have used, and my successes and failures.--Wally Huskonen
Tuesday, October 23, 2012
Wow! I Knew Ancestry.com was Valuable, but ...
Ancestry.com has annouced that it has arranged a sale to take it private. The genealogical database provider has been listed on NASDAQ for several years (Nasdaq:ACOM), and now the major stockholders believe that they can enhance their holdings by taking it private.
Yesterday, Ancestry.com and Permira, a European private equity firm with global reach, announced that a company owned by the Permira funds plus co-investors have entered into a definitive merger agreement to acquire Ancestry.com for $32.00 per share in cash. The total value of the transaction: $1.6 billion.
The good news is (I think) that Tim Sullivan, Ancestry.com’s President and Chief Executive Officer, and Howard Hochhauser, Ancestry.com’s Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer, will maintain a majority of their equity stakes in the company as part of the transaction. Spectrum Equity will also remain an investor in the company.
The current thinking is that this move won't affect the way that subscribers are able to use what is claimed to be the world's largest provider of genealogical data online. We'll see.
If you would like to read the official annoucement, go to my other blog, NEOH Genealogy Blog at http://neohgen.blogspot.com/ to see the news release.
Yesterday, Ancestry.com and Permira, a European private equity firm with global reach, announced that a company owned by the Permira funds plus co-investors have entered into a definitive merger agreement to acquire Ancestry.com for $32.00 per share in cash. The total value of the transaction: $1.6 billion.
The good news is (I think) that Tim Sullivan, Ancestry.com’s President and Chief Executive Officer, and Howard Hochhauser, Ancestry.com’s Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer, will maintain a majority of their equity stakes in the company as part of the transaction. Spectrum Equity will also remain an investor in the company.
The current thinking is that this move won't affect the way that subscribers are able to use what is claimed to be the world's largest provider of genealogical data online. We'll see.
If you would like to read the official annoucement, go to my other blog, NEOH Genealogy Blog at http://neohgen.blogspot.com/ to see the news release.
Wednesday, August 22, 2012
FamilySearch Posts Last 5 States
FamilySearch has sent out the following statement about indexing the 1940 Census:
We did it! The final five states of the 1940 US Census Project have been posted on the FamilySearch.org website! These states include Massachusetts, Michigan, New Jersey, South Carolina and Tennessee. We have posted the indexes for Guam, Panama Canal and Virgin Islands, as well. American Samoa is nearly complete and Puerto Rico is 25% complete. These last two territories will be posted as soon as they are ready to post.
The 1940 US Census Project started on the April 4th of this year. With the posting of the last states today, we have published the census 73 days earlier than expected! What a great thing to brag about. And it was all due to a great group of dedicated volunteer indexers like you.
Once again we want to thank every one of you who have worked so hard to help create this valuable census index. Your efforts have been remarkable. Many will benefit from your hard work for many years to come.
I’ve said this before and would like to repeat it again. We hope you will continue to visit the FamilySearch Indexing site and index some of the many other collections we currently have available. Your indexing and arbitration skills are seriously needed. We invite you to continue using your skills to make more records freely available to all who want to discover who they are and where they came from.
Thank you for being a part of this great project.
We did it! The final five states of the 1940 US Census Project have been posted on the FamilySearch.org website! These states include Massachusetts, Michigan, New Jersey, South Carolina and Tennessee. We have posted the indexes for Guam, Panama Canal and Virgin Islands, as well. American Samoa is nearly complete and Puerto Rico is 25% complete. These last two territories will be posted as soon as they are ready to post.
The 1940 US Census Project started on the April 4th of this year. With the posting of the last states today, we have published the census 73 days earlier than expected! What a great thing to brag about. And it was all due to a great group of dedicated volunteer indexers like you.
Once again we want to thank every one of you who have worked so hard to help create this valuable census index. Your efforts have been remarkable. Many will benefit from your hard work for many years to come.
I’ve said this before and would like to repeat it again. We hope you will continue to visit the FamilySearch Indexing site and index some of the many other collections we currently have available. Your indexing and arbitration skills are seriously needed. We invite you to continue using your skills to make more records freely available to all who want to discover who they are and where they came from.
Thank you for being a part of this great project.
Tuesday, August 21, 2012
Brecksville Bicentennial Book Offered for Sale
I just obtained a copy of the book commenorating the bicentennial of Brecksville, my home town. The bicentennial of Brecksville Township's founding actually was celebrated last year in a year-long celebration, with a specially emphasis during Home Days in June. A historical subcommittee had been working for a couple years on the book and originally hoped to have it available during the Bicentennial Year, but the deadline for copy was gradually pushed back until December 31 2011. Then came the production process of copy editing, submitting photographs, laying it out, and proof reading the pages.
I am proud to have been a subcommittee member working on the book. I researched and wrote the first draft of the first chapter which summarized the founding of Brecksville. It was an interesting and challenging assignment.
I am proud to have been a subcommittee member working on the book. I researched and wrote the first draft of the first chapter which summarized the founding of Brecksville. It was an interesting and challenging assignment.
Honor the
Past, Embrace the Present, Envision the Future can be purchased for $45. The book also
comes with a 2-hr DVD containing videos and photos of the 2011 year-long Bicentennial
celebration. You can purchase the book at the following
locations:
Brecksville City Hall, 9069 Brecksville Road
The Human Services Center, Two Community Drive
The Brecksville Historical Association Archives, Blossom Hill, Oakes
Road
Western Reserve Bank, 8751 Brecksville Road
Faulhaber Funeral Home, 7915 Broadview Road
Books will also be
available at several events during the coming months.
August 26, Concert
on the Square
September 8,
Firefighters’ Clam Bake
October 7, BHA Apple
Butter Festival
October 28,
Booville
November 4-5,
Heartfelt Holiday Alternative (maybe, maybe not)
November 8, Chippewa
Garden Club Design Program
December 2,
Christmas Parade
Please pass this
information on to your friends and neighbors. Thank you for your support of the
Brecksville Bicentennial!
Saturday, August 18, 2012
FamilySearch's Index of 1940 Census Appears Well-Done
I've had a chance to use the updated index to the 1940 Census for Ohio on FamilySearch.org, and it appears to me that it is very well done. Using it, I was able to find a couple of families very easily that presented some problems with the 1940 index on Ancestry.com.
For example, my overall search for my boyhood neighbor, Lawrence Betts, led directly to him on FamilySearch. In Ancestry's index, he was indexed as Lawrence Betta, and I had to scroll through a list of results before I spotted him, along with his father, Harold.
Good job, FamilySearch!
For example, my overall search for my boyhood neighbor, Lawrence Betts, led directly to him on FamilySearch. In Ancestry's index, he was indexed as Lawrence Betta, and I had to scroll through a list of results before I spotted him, along with his father, Harold.
Good job, FamilySearch!
Friday, August 17, 2012
1940 Census--FamilySearch Adds 9 More States, Including Ohio
Below is the latest status report released by FamilySearch.org on indexing the 1940 Census. Note that Ohio is being added in this latest round of index uploads to FamilySearch:
Many
of you have asked what the latest status is for posting the remaining states
that make up the 1940 US Census
project. Today we will be posting 9 more states to the FamilySearch website. These states
include Connecticut, Georgia, Illinois, Kentucky, Maryland, North Carolina,
Ohio, Texas, Wisconsin, for a total of 37,575,945 additional
records.
As it looks now, we will have one more release before the end of the month, at which time the entire census index will be posted as a searchable index. Next week we expect to publish the remaining states of Massachusetts, Michigan, New Jersey, South Carolina, and Tennessee. At that time we will also post the territories of Guam, Panama Canal, and US Virgin Islands. After that, we will have only the two territories of American Samoa and Puerto Rico, which we hope to have posted by the end of the month.
Once again we want to thank the tens of thousands of you who have worked so hard to help create this valuable census index. Your efforts have been remarkable and the results are applauded by many throughout the entire country.
As we bring this project to a close, we hope that you will continue to visit the FamilySearch Indexing site and index some of the other collections we currently have available. Now that you have been trained and have such great experience indexing and arbitrating, we invite you to continue using your skills to make more records freely available to all who want to discover their ancestors and their history.
August
16, 2012 By Steve
As it looks now, we will have one more release before the end of the month, at which time the entire census index will be posted as a searchable index. Next week we expect to publish the remaining states of Massachusetts, Michigan, New Jersey, South Carolina, and Tennessee. At that time we will also post the territories of Guam, Panama Canal, and US Virgin Islands. After that, we will have only the two territories of American Samoa and Puerto Rico, which we hope to have posted by the end of the month.
Once again we want to thank the tens of thousands of you who have worked so hard to help create this valuable census index. Your efforts have been remarkable and the results are applauded by many throughout the entire country.
As we bring this project to a close, we hope that you will continue to visit the FamilySearch Indexing site and index some of the other collections we currently have available. Now that you have been trained and have such great experience indexing and arbitrating, we invite you to continue using your skills to make more records freely available to all who want to discover their ancestors and their history.
Monday, August 13, 2012
Newspaper Article about a Dog Named Buster Adds Information
One day last week I received a phone call from Carl Feather,
a feature writer for the Ashtabula, Ohio, Star
Beacon. He was calling at the suggestion of Penny Redmon, my wife’s first
cousin once removed, to see if we had a photo of Buster, the beloved pet of my
wife’s grandfather, James Van Court. He was writing a feature article about
Buster, and his devotion to James, even after James’ death.
We didn’t have a photo in our family files, but I did a
Google search for “Buster” and “Dog Mourns His Master.” Several search results
showed up as appearing in the online database, NewspaperArchive.com. I have a
subscription to this database so I signed in and searched for Buster.
Many results appeared in papers across the country on or
around June 15, 1936. It seems that an article was distributed by a newspaper
syndication service that told the story of Buster up to that point. Some of the
search results included a photograph with the story.
Accompanying this article is the photo that appeared in the
June 15, 1935, issue of the Circleville, Ohio, Tribune—on the first page no less. [A side note: the price for the
issue was three cents.]
James Van Court was a farmer in Richmond Township in
Ashtabula County. He moved there with his wife, Mary, and sons, Richard and
Clyde, from Ritchey County, West Virginia, before the 1910 census, which shows
them living in Richmond Township. James died in 1928, well before my wife, Mary
Jane, was born. She grew up living on James’ farm so the setting of the story
about Buster was very familiar to her. Otherwise, she knew little about her
Grandfather Van Court.
I reported back to Feather that we didn’t have an original
photo of Buster and forwarded to him a copy of the photo printed in the
Circleville newspaper. In return, he sent me a copy of the article he had
written. It is reproduced below:
Dog Mourns His Master
By Carl E. Feather, Staff Writer, Ashtabula Star Beacon
The most
famous resident of the Richmond Township Cemetery rests in an unmarked grave.
At the
northwest corner of this cemetery are the graves of James and Mary VanCourt,
who migrated to Richmond Township from Richey County, W.Va., around 1915 [sic] and
purchased the farm immediately west of the cemetery. A muscular man with a head
of thick hair and a large, bushy mustache, VanCourt was a farmer and skilled
horse handler.
However
it was his herding dog, a tan-and-white Scotch collie named Buster, for which
VanCourt would become most famous. And the fame would not come until after
VanCourt’s death in the spring of 1928.
From that
point on, Buster, who was 7 at the time of his master’s demise, kept a vigil
beside VanCourt’s grave until the day of his own death, nearly eight years
later.
Buster’s
poignant story made headlines in at least 50 newspapers and was retold in A Book of Famous Dogs, by Albert Payson
Terhune, published in 1939 by The Sun Dial Press.
The late
Jim Fenton VanCourt [Mary Jane’s cousin], who died in January 2011, was
probably the last living person who could claim to have known Buster. Jim was
the grandson of James S. VanCourt and was named after him and his maternal
grandfather, Fenton Gould. Jim VanCourt grew up in Richmond Township about a
half mile from his grandparents’ farm. After his grandfather died, Jim and his
father Richard cared for the herd, rising at 4:30 a.m. to walk the half-mile to
the farm.
“Every
morning Dad [Mary Jane’s uncle, Richard] would say ‘Come on son, we got to go
milk cows.’ I used to walk behind him to help break the cold wind,” said
VanCourt in a telephone interview in 2003.
James S.
VanCourt hand-picked Buster from a litter of pups and trained the dog to be a
herder, driver and watchdog.
“He was
among a litter of pups that Uncle Perry had. Uncle Perry and Aunt Lena lived
near Conneaut,” Jim VanCourt wrote in a letter. “They had a farm as well as ...
orchard. My mother and dad went there to get peaches and pears.” [Perry
migrated to Conneaut Township, Ohio, sometime before the 1930 census.]
Terhune,
in his Famous Dogs volume states that
Buster was taught the precise boundaries of the farm and that he was never to
broach those boarders.
Jim
VanCourt recalls Buster as a smart canine who knew a variety of commands.
“Dad
would say, ‘Buster, go get the bull,’ and he’d bring up the bull. Or he’d say,
‘Buster, go get the horses,’ and he’d bring up the horses,” VanCourt recalled
in the 2003 interview.
As a
youngster, VanCourt used Buster’s intelligence to his own advantage. If he were
responsible for rounding up the cows for the evening milking, VanCourt would
simply get a milk bucket from the barn, rattle it near Buster, and the dog
would proceed to the pasture to herd the animals into the milking parlor.
“He’d
hear that pail rattling and away he’d go,” VanCourt said.
He also
recalls Buster as being very protective of him and his grandmother. “He’d
always stand between her and any one who came into the driveway,” Jim VanCourt
said.
Buster
also protected the lad from ornery roosters that roamed the farm.
“My
grandmother had this old rooster that would get me cornered,” VanCourt said.
“She’d say, ‘Buster, get him!’ Boy, the feathers would fly then. He was quite a
dog.”
VanCourt
does not recall what illness claimed his grandfather, but Terhune’s book
suggests it was a lingering one. [James Van Court’s death certificate states
that the doctor attended him for five months before his death from apoplexy.] Buster
stayed by his side throughout it.
Buster
followed the funeral procession to the cemetery, and after the dirt was mounded
upon the grave, the collie laid down upon it, a living bouquet of faithfulness.
Mary VanCourt and the cemetery superintendent unsuccessfully tried to coax him
from his watch.
The
shadows of the barn slowly crept across the pasture and eventually enveloped Buster
and the grave of his master. Some other animal or person had to round up the
cows that night. Buster had a vigil to keep.
Day after
day, Buster remained on the grave, despite the daily visit and coaxing of Mary
VanCourt. She brought sustenance to him, as did neighbors who heard about his
dedication and came to see this phenomenon for themselves. But he ate and drank
little.
Word of
the collie’s stunt spread beyond the hamlet, and Buster’s story was soon
printed in both local and regional newspapers. It seemed as if the more press
and visitations he received, the more determined the dog became to waste away
on the grave of his master.
“At these
increasing signs of pining away, human attention redoubled,” writes Terhune.
“In scorching suns, in sluicing rains, Buster maintained his queer vigil; while
the farm work suffered acutely from the chore dog’s absence.”
Eventually,
the sight of a farm dog starving himself on his master’s grave no longer became
a novelty. The crowds stopped coming. Buster got lonely. And very, very hungry.
On some
unrecorded resurrection morning, Buster, by this time a skeleton with matted,
muddy fur hanging from it, rose from the mound and galloped down the hill to
the farmhouse. His arrival was greeted by the family’s joy and rewarded with a
hearty breakfast and long stop at the watering tub.
His body
thus nourished, Buster returned to the farm and resumed his duties of keeping
things in order until evening, when he returned to the pasture and brought the
cows in for milking.
But when
his duties were done, Buster cast his eyes toward the knoll, trotted across the
pasture, crawled under the wire fence between field and cemetery, and, with a
sigh, laid down upon his master’s grave.
The next
morning, Buster was back at the farmhouse, ready to begin his duties.
For the
next seven years, this became Buster’s life: work on the farm when duty called;
climb the hill to the cemetery when the grief became overwhelming. His myriad
trips, always taken along the same direct route from farmhouse to grave, made
“afresh each season a well worn path across fields of summer grain and winter
snow,” according to an Aug. 11, 1932, article in the Ashtabula Star-Beacon.
The years
of sleeping in wintry torment, of barking commands at the cows and living with
a heavy heart finally took their toll on Buster. Age was wearing away at Mary
VanCourt, as well, whose poor health often confined her to the same room where
her husband settled his debt to youth.
Buster
transferred his vigil to the widow, choosing a spot outside the kitchen door
where he could monitor her well-being while keeping an eye on the grave across
the pasture. His trips to the grave became less frequent as arthritis took its
toll on his joints and time clouded his once bright eyes.
On March
31, 1936, Buster attempted one more trip to the grave of his master, but his
tired body could not make the journey. Family members found him lying exhausted
in the meadow. They carried him to the back porch of the farmhouse, where he
lay whimpering and crying through the night, “his shaggy head between feeble
forepaws,” according to a newspaper story.
At 4 a.m.
April 1, Mary VanCourt awoke and instinctively listened for Buster’s
whimpering. All was quiet, except for the wind moaning across the cemetery
knoll.
Jim
VanCourt’s father and his uncle, Clyde, buried Buster at 10:30 that morning, at
the eastern border of the farm, just a few feet from the grave of James
VanCourt. It was Mary VanCourt’s wish that the beloved, faithful dog be buried
near her husband’s grave, at the spot in the fence where he had entered the
cemetery countless times.
They
chose for his coffin a treasured wooden toolbox that had belonged to his
master.
Mary
VanCourt died in 1945. Jim still cried when he thought of her and those days on
the farm. “I can still see my grandmother going out to gather the eggs at the
hen house and Buster tagging right along with her,” he said. “It was a good
life.”
The farm
passed to Clyde VanCourt, then to his son, Syd, who died in 2000. The
VanCourts, like Buster, have faded from the Richmond Township scene.
No stone
marks the grave of this faithful companion. Seventy-six cycles of life and
death have reclaimed the path that Buster’s massive paws once cut across the
pasture. Terhune’s book is long out of print and the sheets of newsprint on
which his stories were printed are yellowed and crumbling.
“Many of
us humans live too long,” wrote Terhune. “But I think all dogs die too soon.”
Standing
on the Richmond Cemetery knoll on a summer afternoon, looking west toward the
old barn and pasture, one who knows the story of Buster can imagine a happier
scene in an ethereal world beyond our own.
“Today,
one likes to believe,” a newspaper reporter wrote on April 1, 1936, “Buster
trots beside his master in the warm sun of eternal springtime, happy; his body
and eyes young once again, forever.”
Special
thanks to Penny Redmon of Jefferson, the great-granddaughter of James and Mary
VanCourt and daughter of Jim VanCourt, for providing a copy of the rare Terhune
volume and family photos for this story.
Labels:
Ashtabula,
Google,
Historic newspapers,
Richmond,
Van Court
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)